The Starfield PS5 Petition Is Incredibly Dumb, Yet Kinda Right
In great idiocy, we can find great wisdom.
In great idiocy, we can find great wisdom.
It's all right, guys. We've been here before.
There's a lot to do out there in space.
With Baldur’s Gate 3 and Starfield coming out a mere month apart, some hard decisions have to be made.
Bethesda's track record for romance ain't great, so best keep things short and sweet.
The debates are getting a bit cringeworthy, to be honest.
AMD's refusal to comment about whether its deal blocks Nvidia's DLSS is a tad worrying.
I can't wait to go on mining expeditions without looking over my shoulder all the time.
Is humanity just 300 short years from discovering life on Mars?
A mostly lifeless cosmos is expected, but the settled parts really need to shine.
Todd Howard didn't confirm Steam Deck support for Starfield, but he also didn't completely shut the idea down...
Todd Howard reveals that only 10% of planets will support life.
Starfield is certainly loved, but for all the wrong reasons.
From the stiff animations to the dialogue ‘power-zoom,’ Starfield looks every bit the goofy Bethesda RPG.
A proper overhead building view is a start, but there’s more work to be done in overcoming Fallout 4’s flawed base-building.
The game will build each planet on the fly after the player lands on it.
And yes, the Adoring Fan is indeed back.
One online mathematician thinks they've got it all figured out.